KVV Inc AttorneysA court held a roads authority liable for severe injuries caused by a pothole it knew, or should have known, about. The case highlights when public authorities may be liable for failing to repair dangerous road defects or warn motorists.
KVV Inc AttorneysA recent South African court case highlights the principle of "unjustified enrichment." To claim unjustified enrichment, one must prove the recipient was enriched at your expense, you were impoverished, and the enrichment was unjustified. The court emphasized that once the couple admitted receiving the money without legal basis, they had to prove they repaid it.
KVV Inc AttorneysA recent South African High Court case highlights the legal risks faced by property owners renting accommodation. A family's holiday turned tragic when a "freak" flood swept away their toddler. Despite the owner's claims of unforeseeability and disclaimers, the court ruled that the possibility of flooding was foreseeable, and the owner's failure to take protective measures constituted negligence.
KVV Inc AttorneysExemption clauses are crucial for businesses seeking to limit liability. Businesses should ensure their contracts clearly outline the extent of any exemptions, as any ambiguity could be detrimental. Customers should carefully review contracts and consider appropriate insurance coverage.
KVV Inc AttorneysOnline defamation can severely damage reputations, impacting both individuals and businesses. Legal recourse is available, and courts act swiftly in such cases. While damages claims address past defamation, interdicts offer immediate protection against ongoing attacks. A recent High Court case saw a property developer successfully interdict a roofing contractor's false and defamatory online campaign, which included accusations of fraud and safety violations.
KVV Inc AttorneysConsequential loss, an indirect result of an insured event, is often excluded from insurance coverage. A recent court case highlighted this issue when a transport company, despite having goods-in-transit insurance, was held liable for consequential loss (loss of profit) due to damaged goods. The insurer refused to pay, as the policy excluded consequential financial loss. The court determined the loss was foreseeable, leaving the transport company to pay the substantial damages claim out of pocket
KVV Inc. Attorneys: Celebrating 10 Years of Excellence in Property Law and Conveyancing.
Fostering Partnerships, Driving Results.
© KVV Inc. Attorneys 2026. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | POPIA
KVV Inc. Attorneys: Celebrating 10 Years of Excellence in Property Law and Conveyancing.
Fostering Partnerships,
Driving Results.
© KVV Inc. Attorneys 2026.
All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | POPIA